Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 233, 2023 06 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In ARDS, the PEEP level associated with the best respiratory system compliance is often selected; however, intra-tidal recruitment can increase compliance, falsely suggesting improvement in baseline mechanics. Tidal lung hysteresis increases with intra-tidal recruitment and can help interpreting changes in compliance. This study aims to assess tidal recruitment in ARDS patients and to test a combined approach, based on tidal hysteresis and compliance, to interpret decremental PEEP trials. METHODS: A decremental PEEP trial was performed in 38 COVID-19 moderate to severe ARDS patients. At each step, we performed a low-flow inflation-deflation manoeuvre between PEEP and a constant plateau pressure, to measure tidal hysteresis and compliance. RESULTS: According to changes of tidal hysteresis, three typical patterns were observed: 10 (26%) patients showed consistently high tidal-recruitment, 12 (32%) consistently low tidal-recruitment and 16 (42%) displayed a biphasic pattern moving from low to high tidal-recruitment below a certain PEEP. Compliance increased after 82% of PEEP step decreases and this was associated to a large increase of tidal hysteresis in 44% of cases. Agreement between best compliance and combined approaches was accordingly poor (K = 0.024). The combined approach suggested to increase PEEP in high tidal-recruiters, mainly to keep PEEP constant in biphasic pattern and to decrease PEEP in low tidal-recruiters. PEEP based on the combined approach was associated with lower tidal hysteresis (92.7 ± 20.9 vs. 204.7 ± 110.0 mL; p < 0.001) and lower dissipated energy per breath (0.1 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 J; p < 0.001) compared to the best compliance approach. Tidal hysteresis ≥ 100 mL was highly predictive of tidal recruitment at next PEEP step reduction (AUC 0.97; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of tidal hysteresis improves the interpretation of decremental PEEP trials and may help limiting tidal recruitment and energy dissipated into the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation of ARDS patients.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids , COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Patients , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Lung
2.
Intern Emerg Med ; 18(3): 821-830, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275349

ABSTRACT

More than 11.5 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered around the world. Although vaccine effectiveness for severe infections is reported to be 89.0%, breakthrough infections are common and may lead to severe outcome in fragile population. We conducted a real-world observational study on 420 COVID-19 admitted patients from July 2021 to January 2022 in a tertiary level Italian hospital. We collected patient's vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 serological status, SARS-CoV-2 treatments, oxygen supports, intensive (ICU) and subintensive (sub-ICU) care unit admissions, length of staying (LoS) and in-hospital mortality. One-hundred-seventy-two vaccinated and 248 unvaccinated patients were admitted during the study period. Vaccinated group (Vg) had a significantly more elevated Charlson Comorbidity Index than Unvaccinated group (UVg), and no statistical differences were found in terms of in-hospital mortality, LoS or ICU and sub-ICU admissions. Among Vg, anti-S antibodies were detected in 86.18% of patients (seropositives). Vaccinated seronegative patients' in-hospital mortality was significantly higher than vaccinated seropositive patients (33.33% vs 10.69%, p = 0.0055): in particular, mortality rate in 45-69 years old population was higher in vaccinated seronegative group, and comparable in patients ≥ 70 years old. No differences in terms of outcome were registered between Vg and UVg, taking into account that Vg was considerably older and with more comorbidities. In line with other recent observations, higher mortality rate was evidenced for seronegative vaccinated patients. Primary prophylaxis and early treatments result to be necessary, especially for older and immunosuppressed populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitals, University , Italy/epidemiology
4.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(5): 675-684, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1706199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A few cases of Herpes Zoster and Simplex reactivation following COVID-19 immunization have been recently described, but the real extent of this suspected adverse event has not been elucidated yet. METHODS: We performed a nested case/control study by using the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database. We carried out a case-level clinical review of all Herpes reactivation cases following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. For cases and controls, significance was set at P = 0.05, differential risk of reporting was assessed for each vaccine as reporting odds ratio and incidence was estimated based on the total number of vaccine doses administered. RESULTS: Of 6,195 cases included in the analysis (5,934 and 273 reporting Herpes Zoster and Herpes Simplex, respectively) over 90% were non-serious. We found a slightly higher risk of reporting both for Zoster (ROR = 1.49) and Simplex (ROR = 1.51) infections following the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The estimated incidence was approximately 0.7/100,000 and 0.03/100,000 for Zoster and Simplex, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of cases (almost all of non-serious nature) makes the potential occurrence of this adverse effect negligible from clinical standpoints, thus supporting the good safety profile of the COVID-19 vaccination, which remains strongly recommended.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Herpes Simplex , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Herpes Zoster , Vaccines , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/adverse effects , Herpesvirus 3, Human , Humans , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effects
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1648610

ABSTRACT

Messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been recently associated with acute myocarditis, predominantly in healthy young males. Out of 231,989 vaccines administrated in our region (Marche, Italy), we report a case series of six healthy patients (four males and two females, 16.5 years old (Q1, Q3: 15, 18)) that experienced mRNA-COVID-19-vaccines side effects. All patients were hospitalized due to fever and troponins elevation following the second dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed 72-96 h after vaccination. All patients were treated with colchicine and ibuprofen. Myocarditis was prevalent in males. It was characterized by myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the lateral wall of the left ventricle (LV). One patient showed sole right ventricular involvement, while the females presented with myopericarditis (myocarditis + pericardial effusion). All patients in our series had preserved LV ejection fraction and remained clinically stable during a relatively short inpatient hospital stay. One case presented with atrial tachycardia. At the follow-up, no significant CMR findings were documented after a three-month medical treatment. According to other recently published case series, our report suggests a possible association between acute myocarditis and myopericarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in healthy young adults and pediatric patients. Not only males are involved, while some arrhythmic manifestations are possible, such as atrial tachycardia. Conversely, we here highlight the benign nature of such complications and the absence of CMR findings after a three-month medical treatment with colchicine and ibuprofen.

6.
Crit Care ; 24(1): 665, 2020 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-992529

ABSTRACT

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

7.
Critical Care ; 24(1), 2020.
Article in English | BioMed Central | ID: covidwho-942048

ABSTRACT

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

10.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 46(8): 2090-2093, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-186451

ABSTRACT

Lung ultrasound gained a leading position in the last year as an imaging technique for the assessment and management of patients with acute respiratory failure. In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), its role may be of further importance because it is performed bedside and may limit chest X-ray and the need for transport to radiology for computed tomography (CT) scan. Since February 21, we progressively turned into a coronavirus-dedicated intensive care unit and applied an ultrasound-based approach to avoid traditional imaging and limit contamination as much as possible. We performed a complete daily examination with lung ultrasound score computation and systematic search of complications (pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia); on-duty physicians were free to perform CT or chest X-ray when deemed indicated. We compared conventional imaging exams performed in the first 4 wk of the COVID-19 epidemic with those in the same time frame in 2019: there were 84 patients in 2020 and 112 in 2019; 64 and 22 (76.2% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001) had acute respiratory failure, respectively, of which 55 (85.9%) were COVID-19 in 2020. When COVID-19 patients in 2020 were compared with acute respiratory failure patients in 2019, the median number of chest X-rays was 1.0 (1.0-2.0) versus 3.0 (1.0-4.0) (p = 0.0098); 2 patients 2 (3.6%) versus 7 patients (31.8%) had undergone at least one thoracic CT scan (p = 0.001). A self-imposed ultrasound-based approach reduces the number of chest X-rays and thoracic CT scans in COVID-19 patients compared with patients with standard acute respiratory failure, thus reducing the number of health care providers exposed to possible contamination and sparing personal protective equipment.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Euro Surveill ; 25(17)2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-142724

ABSTRACT

We analysed the first 84 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients hospitalised in an infectious and tropical disease unit in Florence, Italy, over 30 days after the start of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. A 12% reduction in the rate of intensive care unit transfer was observed after the implementation of intensity care measures in the regular ward such as increasing the nurse/patient ratio, presence of critical care physicians and using high flow nasal cannulae oxygenation.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Age Distribution , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cannula , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Contact Tracing , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Critical Care , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Transfer , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Respiratory Care Units , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Distribution , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL